Monday, 14 October 2013

Industrial Product Design.

The following is the summary I was given for the subject Product Design at the University of South Australia.

INDUSTRIAL DESIGN

Industrial Design is the process of adjustment of industrially producible commodities to the physiological and psychological needs of the user of those.

PROCESS OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN
INFORMATION (To Produce the BRIEF/TECHNICAL PACKAGE)

  1. Users Needs Analysis/ Peeves Analysis
  2. Ergonomics (physiology & psychology)
  3. Environmental Analysis
  4. Historical Analysis
  5. Market Analysis
  6. Functional Analysis
  7. Structural Analysis
  8. Cost Analysis
  9. Manufacturing Analysis / Peeves Analysis
  10. Service & Maintenance / Peeves Analysis


FORMATION (To Produce DESIGN PROPOSAL)

  1. Symbolic Function of Product
  2. Aesthetic Function of Product
  3. Design Concepts
  4. Model Studies
  5. Evaluation of Concepts
  6. Resolve Preferred Design in Detail


COMMUNICATION (Presentation of Final Design)

  1. Renderings
  2. Functional Drawings
  3. Exploded Drawings / Assemblies
  4. Technical Drawings
  5. 3D Model
  6. Report (evaluations, choice of directions)
  7. Documentation (specification)
  8. Prototype (if necessary)


FOLLOW UP

  1. Test first run products to specification
  2. Correct Errors
  3. Redefine Specification
  4. Keep in Touch with Product




Sunday, 29 September 2013

Fundamentals of Shed Design Pt#1

The fundamental tasks for structural design of just about any building structure can be classified as follows:

  1. Dimension & Geometry
  2. Design Actions
  3. Design Action-Effects
  4. Member Design/Specification
  5. Connection Design/Specification
  6. Footing Design/Specification


Generic Connection Details cold-formed Steel Sheds and Canopies

BUILDING INDUSTRY EXAMPLE OF OCCUPATIONAL TASKS

Tracer Receives CAD file of building floor plan and elevations. Copies file and provides with name to match company standards. Deletes irrelevant data, modifies layers as required to meet company/project standards. Inserts drawing sheet, fills in title block and otherwise sets up basis of drawing.

Drafter Receives drawing from tracer, decides additional sections, views and details. Then produces additional drawings as necessary.

Design-Drafter
Receives drawings from drafter then designs dependent systems and prepares additional drawings. Includes structural drawings, mechanical services (HVAC, water supply, sanitary drainage), electrical services (power supply, lighting, communications, data, security).

Technician Designer/Analyst Reviews design-drafters drawings or produces themselves. Uses Design handbooks, manufacturers catalogues, and codes of practice to evaluate the suitability of the drawn design-solutions. For example size air conditioning units and ducting, size water pipes and sanitary drainage pipes, size and locate vents to drainage system. Size power cables, lighting and switching cables, determine number of circuits and design circuit layout. Size simple beams, columns and connections.

Engineering Officer (Design/Analyst) Single air conditioning duct not suitable, and more complex network or ducts proposed, similarly for water pipes and sanitary drainage. Electrical system demands more than normal mains supply can provide, sophisticated control systems and programming required, possibly small substation or emergency power supply. Structural forms less routine, instead of applying routine formulae need to apply routine procedures. Otherwise involved in developing design tools for technician designer/analysts. Designers do not want to be held back by the evaluation of the suitability they want to get on with applying suitable solutions to their design problems.

Engineering Technologist (Designer/Analyst) Principally employed developing design tools for the lower level designers. Typically should not be involved in day to day design projects unless the employing enterprise specialises in high end design projects. There are very few high end design projects; our industrial society already exists, and therefore all our industrial systems have been designed and constructed already. The primary requirement is therefore to APPLY the solutions and improve the solutions, and improve our ability to apply and supply the solutions.

Engineer (Designer/Analyst) Generally should not be required on a building project. However new scientific research may provide economies not previously available and demand the skills of engineers until specialist technicians have been trained and appropriate design tools developed.

Architect (Designer/Analyst) Architects may have designed the original floor plan provided to the tracer in the first instance, but more likely a design-drafter produced the original floor plan. Internal fixtures for the building maybe design by an industrial product designer, but also most likely designed by design-drafters or even drafters.

CONCLUSIONBasically once an architect has developed a suitable building-solution for a particular application, the solution can be applied by design-drafters or drafters to a multitude of similar situations. When it comes to needs, supply is more important than any objections an architect may have about aesthetics and repetition. Besides repetitive buildings tend to acquire individuality, as they evolve with the end-users usage. Fundamentally therefore the vast majority of our technological systems should be within the scope of technicians to design and evaluate. Tracers, Drafters and Design-Drafters should be capable of being trained on the job, and pursuit of self-study. They should be able to use books on engineering graphics, technical drawing, manufacturers catalogues, prescriptive codes of practice and experience gained from drafting other designers design-solutions to develop their own design-solutions for given design problems.

ARCHITECTS / INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT DESIGNERS

Historically industrial product design was developed by architects, applying the principles of design outside the arena of the built environment. Architects have less focus on the detailed quantitative assessment of designs and more focus on the qualitative aspects of design. The architect is equivalent to the engineer, with lower level technologists, building designers and architectural drafters below. Architects normally employ the services of engineering consultancies for detailed quantitative assessment of design-solutions.

ENGINEER (DESIGNER/ANALYST)

Minimum education 4 year Bachelor of Engineering (or equivalent) in the design and enabling sciences. The design problems cannot be solved by APPLYING known solutions, nor by ADAPTING such known solutions, ORIGINAL solutions are required. Evaluation of the design-solutions is beyond the scope of known design-science and additional empirical research and original evaluation models need to be determined. Once the design-science has been developed it can be passed down the line, so that the design-solutions can be APPLIED and ADAPTED by others.

ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIST (DESIGNER/ANALYST)

Minimum education 3 year Bachelor of Technology (or equivalent) in the design and enabling sciences. They principally ADAPT routine solutions to the circumstances of new projects. Routine design-solutions are unsuitable and the methods of assessment/evaluation need to be adapted to fit the design-solution proposed. Some potential exists for novel and original solutions and empirical research.

ENGINEERING OFFICER (DESIGNER/ANALYST)

Minimum education of 2 year Associate Diploma (or equivalent) in the design and enabling sciences. Like the technician, they APPLY routine solutions to new projects, the solutions however are more complex and flexible, and some potential exists for ADAPTING the solutions to new circumstances.